April 10, 2021

The Geopolitics of Rare-earths Elements and a History of Chinese Dominance in the Market

By Claudio Minutillo Turtur

Despite their name, rare-earths elements (REE) are not hard to find at all: they are all over the world. What is difficult is mining them in such a way to make them economically profitable. And in the last thirty years, only one country has managed to succeed in doing so: China. It was, however, far from like this sixty years ago. Then, the leader as far as REE were concerned was the USA, where the “Critical Materials Institute” played a fundamental role.

 

“Global rare earth reserves as of 2020, in 1000 metric tons REO”, 2020. 

Data from Statista through USGS.

How did the situation change so drastically from the 1950s? The reason breaks down essentially to two important factors: the ability of the Chinese government to keep REE’s prices low, therefore always putting them at a competitive advantage, and the state-backed huge investments in infrastructures to mine REE and technologies to produce end-products from them.

The results of these policies are quite extraordinary: today China accounts for 81% of rare-earth elements production and it has supplied 80% of the REE imported by the US between 2014 and 2017. Moreover, it has recently become the world’s biggest importer of the materials as well, making itself practically ubiquitous in the whole process.

 

“Rare earth metals productions and reserves in Tonnes”, 2018. 

Data from USGS.

 

Another reason why China’s influence in the market flourished so much relates to the environmental costs of the REE extraction. Since the ores that contain the elements also contain radioactive materials that need to be separated and wasted, several western countries faced backlash when confronted by NGOs and environmental groups on the matter, and have then been happy to let China do the dirty business. “Thanks” to the different sensibility on the topic, China was given a hand from the West, and didn’t miss the chance. But it must also been said that, along with China’s growing commitment in the international order, the PRC has recently started a strong operation to curb illegal REE mining in the country. Finally, China has in the past tried – and partially succeeded- to leverage its market power in order to become a de facto monopolist in the sector. The strategy it has employed to reach that goal is that of limiting exports in western countries (especially Japan), so that companies could delocalize in China. As previously said, it partially succeeded in his plan since BMW and General Electric partly moved there, but ultimately failed since Japan, the USA and the EU brought the case in front of the WTO who ruled in favour of the illegality of the practice, that therefore was halted.

 

“Uses of rare earth elements in the US”, 2017.

Data from the United States Geological Survey Mineral Commodity Survey.

 

Why are they so relevant?

With the Western desire to become carbon neutral by 2050, the topic of rare-earth elements has resurfaced, as virtually every electric vehicle, as well as solar cells or magnets for wind turbines is built employing REE. But the USA has another sector whose ties with China’s REE export is crucial: national defence. For example, Lockheed Martin Corp. and Raytheon Co missiles use REE in their guidance systems and sensors. And it is then not surprising that during the ongoing trade war between China and the US, the latter has yet not imposed tariffs on Chinese exported REE.

With that in mind it is clear why President Biden at the end of February has included in the “Executive Order on America’s Supply Chains” the topic of REE, following more or less the same strategy that former President Trump had put in place when in charge. The idea is pretty straightforward: the US cannot be so dependent on a crucial product such as rare-earth elements on China, it needs to develop his own parallel supply chain in order not to collapse should another Chinese export-ban occur. In order to reach this goal, the US needs support from his Asia-Pacific allies, first of all Australia, which is the only other relevant player in the REE market, accounting for roughly  11% of it. The Australian rare-earth miner “Lynas” will be in fact supported by the US Department of Defence in building a processing facility in Texas, and more and more cooperation is expected in the future.

 

Could we envision a future of REE without China’s influence?

The short answer is no, what we can nonetheless forecast is possible less dependency on China. How? By looking at Japan for example. Being the clear target of the Chinese export ban in 2010, the nation has quickly learned the lesson and started to develop his own strategy. The then and ongoing governments have moved in various directions to ensure they would not find themselves in the same weak position they experienced ten years ago.

First of all they have, also for environmental reasons, started to recycle the REE whenever possible. Second of all, they have heavily invested in research in substitution of REE, and thirdly they have promoted international diversification with grant programs. The results have been promising: by 2017 30% of REE imports came from Asian countries other than China, therefore putting Japan in a situation much better than the one it was facing in 2010, making then possible for the country to cope significantly better should China decide to switch to a more protectionist strategy.

The “green revolution” will be the geopolitical chessboard of the next decade; if the US want to -as they have done in the past- write the rules of the game and win it, they need to reindustrialize the nation, finance research and education to rebuild expertise in the field and cooperate closely with Japan and the other allies against China’s immense power.

 

 

References:

https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/geopolitics-rare-earth-elements

https://twitter.com/alearesu/status/1364672597829509130

https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/Biden-s-Asia-policy/US-and-allies-to-build-China-free-tech-supply-chain

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/02/24/executive-order-on-americas-supply-chains/

https://www.nbr.org/publication/chinas-control-of-rare-earth-metals/

https://www.wired.com/story/rare-earths-next-pawn-us-china-trade-war/

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-rareearth-explainer-idUSKCN1T00EK

“Le potenze del capitalismo politico, Stati Uniti e Cina”, Alessandro Aresu, 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyH_PvLZoD0

https://www.lemonde.fr/planete/video/2019/09/28/terres-rares-des-materiaux-indispensables-qui-menacent-la-planete_6013426_3244.html

https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780190670931.001.0001/oso-9780190670931-chapter-5

https://kclgpris.com/2020/11/20/the-rise-of-a-new-geopolitical-risk-part-one-china-the-geopolitics-of-rare-earths-and-the-european-unions-green-energy-transition/

https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaip1927.pdf

In this Section

About the Author

SIMILAR POSTS

Gianni Cincotta

With half of all Australia in lockdown, there is perhaps no more pressing time to consider some of the key dynamics affecting Australia’s Covid-response. In the nation’s worst affected states,…

Read more

Lorenzo Gazzola

After almost 16 years in office and at least a decade as Europe’s unquestioned leader, Angela Merkel prepares to step down as German Chancellor in the fall. Throughout her tenure,…

Read more

Andrea Manzella

As a reminder for the Italian confused and polycentric coalition, the Prime Minister Mario Draghi has lately reiterated the pressure Brussels is putting on Rome to spend efficiently the resources…

Read more